Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
null
J Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Brief Report
    • Case Report
    • Data Paper
    • Editorial
    • Hand
    • Meeting Reports/Abstracts
    • Methods Article
    • Product Review
    • Research Article
    • Review Article
    • Review Articles
    • Systematic Review
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • "Open Mic" Topic Sessions
  • Advertisers
  • Recorded Content
  • CME
  • JOEI KOL Connect
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://journaloei.scholasticahq.com/feed
Meeting Reports/Abstracts
Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2022August 19, 2022 EDT

3D Bioprinted GelMA-Gelatin-Hydroxyapatite Osteoblast Laden Composite Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Lindsey Johnson, Nicholas B. Allen, Bijan Abar, Richard Danilkowicz, Samuel B. Adams,
BioprintingHydrogelsBone Tissue EngineeringInnovationMSOSOsteoblast3D Bioprinting3D PrintingHydroxyapatiteBioengineering
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.36645
J Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Johnson, Lindsey, Nicholas B. Allen, Bijan Abar, Richard Danilkowicz, and Samuel B. Adams. 2022. “3D Bioprinted GelMA-Gelatin-Hydroxyapatite Osteoblast Laden Composite Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering.” Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 3 (2). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.60118/​001c.36645.
Save article as...▾
Download all (9)
  • Introduction
    Download
  • Download
  • Download
  • Hypothesis
    Download
  • Download
  • Materials and Methods
    Download
  • Results
    Download
  • Download
  • Conclusion
    Download

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

If this problem reoccurs, please contact Scholastica Support

Error message:

undefined

View more stats

Abstract

Introduction

3D bioprinting offers a novel solution to critical sized bone defects by allowing the placement of osteogenic cells, additive biomaterials and bioactive signaling that mimic native tissue. We describe the suitability of an extrusion-based 3D bioink composed of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), gelatin, hydroxyapatite (HA), and osteoblasts for bone tissue engineering.

Methods

A mouse calvarial osteoblast-laden GelMA-gelatin-LAP bioink consisting of various concentrations of HA was 3D-bioprinted into a porous hydrogel construct. After days 1, 14, and 28, five constructs from each HA concentration were analyzed. The water weight percent differences of the hydrogels and the degradation behavior in enzyme solution were characterized. An ALP assay and histological analysis were performed. Cell survivability was determined using a LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytoxicity Kit and AlamarBlue Cell Viability reagent. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to measure expression levels of bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) and Osteocalcin (BGLAP).

Results

The addition of 5, 10, and 20 mg/ml of HA significantly reduced hydrogel swelling (p ≤ 0.01) from baseline GelMA-Gelatin hydrogels (Figure 3A). HA significantly decreased hydrogel breakdown in a concentration dependent manner (Figure 3B, p ≤ 0.001). A significant increase in cell proliferation at day 28 was noted in all groups (Figure 3D). ALP activity (Figure 3E) significantly increased with the addition of 5mg/ml and 20mg/ml of HA at days 7 and 28 (p ≤ 0.05). Live/dead staining at 1, 14, and 28 days showed high chondrocyte viability. The addition of 20mg/ml of HA demonstrated significantly greater BMP7 and BGLAP gene expression at both 14 and 28 days over the hydrogels without HA (Figure 5, p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion

The addition of HA to GelMA-gelatin hydrogels significantly decreased hydrogel swelling, improved the ability of the hydrogel to resist enzymatic degradation, increased osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization, and increased osteogenic gene expression while maintaining equal cell viability and proliferation to non-HA hydrogels.

This is the third of four award-winning presentations from the inaugural Medical School Orthopedic Society (MSOS) symposium. MSOS is a medical student-run initiative with a mission to support “research and educational opportunities for students interested in orthopedic surgery.”

This presentation was given by Lindsey Johnson, a rising fourth-year medical student at Campbell University who recently completed an orthopedic surgery research year at Duke University.

Introduction

One of the unmet needs in orthopedic surgery is the critical-sized bone defect. These defects can be the result of congenital deformity, high energy trauma, non-union, failed arthrodesis or arthroplasty or the degenerative pathology we see in Charcot.

The current treatment options for these bone voids are limited in their size, risk of rejection or infection. They often require multiple operations that are burdensome for the patient.

3D-printing has partially addressed these concerns through patient-specific implants often made of titanium or cobalt chrome, but these are still foreign materials that are subject to the same risk of infection and non-union.

Hypothesis

In our study, we described the suitability of an extrusion-based 3D bioink composed of gelatin and gelatin methacryloyl with various concentrations of hydroxyapatite (HA). Osteoblasts were added to this bioink formula for bone tissue engineering. We hypothesized that the addition of HA would (1) decrease hydrogel swelling and degradation and (2) increase osteoblast cell proliferation and markers of bone matrix deposition.

This is where bioprinting comes into play! The ultimate goal is that the bioprinted construct will be implanted in the body, but ultimately degrade as the patient’s bone grows in its place.

A micro-CT image is created often from the contralateral limb. This file is translated into a form readable by the bioprinter, which lays down a layer-by-layer construct from the bioink components. The printed construct then undergoes a crosslinking process for stability and is placed into osteogenic culture media to allow the cells to grow into the hydrogel.

Materials and Methods

We printed our hydrogel construct in a porous cube with the respective components previously described. The construct then underwent crosslinking via photopolymerization under UV light, which was then cultured in media for 1, 14 and 28 days. After which we performed a swelling and degradation analysis, cell viability and proliferation assay, and routine histology.

Results

The addition of HA at any concentration significantly reduced hydrogel swelling in comparison to the same hydrogel without HA (Figure A). This is clinically relevant to future in vivo implantation as minimizing hydrogel swelling would help ensure the construct does not significantly change size when implanted in the body. HA significantly decreased hydrogel breakdown in the presence of type IV collagenase, an enzyme present in the body that serves as surrogate for how quickly the construct would degrade in the body (Figure B).

The results in Figure C are critical to the overall tissue engineering process. Printed constructs will require a time in media before implantation to allow the cells to proliferate. However, HA did not decrease hydrogel degradation as was seen with collagenase (Figure C). A significant increase in cell proliferation at day 28 was noted in all groups, indicating that HA was not cytotoxic at any concentration (AlamarBlue) (Figure D).

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity is an early marker of osteogenic differentiation. In our study, ALP activity significantly increased with the addition of 5 mg/mL and 20 mg/mL of HA at days 7 and 28. This suggests that HA plays a role in osteoblast differentiation and mineralization (Figure E). Figure F shows the results of post-printing cellular surviving, indicating that the cells could withstand the stress of the printing process (Figure F).

Live/dead staining on the left visually confirms the results that the cells were alive at each time point, post-printing with the green cells being the live ones and the red being the dead cells.
Finally, we looked at levels of gene expression of BMP-7 and Osteocalcin, a bone protein and an osteoblast-derived hormone, respectively. In all cases, the addition of 20 mg/mL of HA resulted in significantly greater gene expression of BMP-7 and Osteocalcin over hydrogels without HA. This indicates 20 mg/mL is the lowest threshold HA concentration to support osteogenic gene expression.

Conclusion

The addition of HA to GelMA-gelatin hydrogels (1) decreased hydrogel swelling, (2) improved resistance to enzymatic degradation, (3) increased osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization, (4) increased osteogenic gene expression, and (5) maintained equal cell viability and proliferation. These are some of the first steps toward a viable, 3D bioprinted implant.


Disclosures

The authors do not have anything to disclose pertaining to this presentation.

Submitted: May 23, 2022 EDT

Accepted: June 23, 2022 EDT

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system