Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
J Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Brief Report
    • Case Report
    • Case Series
    • Conference Proceedings
    • Data Paper
    • Editorial
    • Meeting Reports/Abstracts
    • Methods Article
    • Product Review
    • Research Article
    • Review Article
    • Review Articles
    • Systematic Review
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • "Open Mic" Topic Sessions
  • Advertisers
  • Recorded Content
  • CME
  • JOEI KOL Connect
  • Resident Research League
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://journaloei.scholasticahq.com/feed
ISSN 2691-6541
Research Article
Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2026June 06, 2026 EDT

Integrating Patient-Reported Functional Outcome Measures in Determining Eligibility for Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty

Derrick Kang, Lachlan Kirby, Alex Hernandez Manriquez, Manjot Singh, MD, Joyce Harary, Peter L Schilling, Wayne E Moschetti,
PROMsTotal Hip ArthroplastyOutpatientEligibilityFunctional OutcomesPredictors
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.154242

Articles in Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2026

Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2026
  • At The Conference...My 5, maybe 6 Pearls for Hip Revision
    Jon Minter
  • At The Conference...Total Joint Infections: Cutting-Edge Updates and Game-Changing Strategies
    Joshua Rozell, MD
  • Analyzing Ankle Injuries in the NFL: A Video-Based Investigation of the Impact of Artificial Turf on Injury Mechanisms
    Mina GhaliNabeel MohammadRodolfo J. RodriguezHeidi IsraelLisa K. Cannada
  • At The Conference™...Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty in the ASC
    Brandon Naylor, DO
  • From My Perspective...InSpace Balloon: Real Solution?
    Matthew DiPaola, MD
  • Impact of Lower Extremity Injuries on Performance Metrics by Position in Male Major League Soccer Players: A Position-Specific Analysis of Return to Play and Performance from 2018-2023
    Marcela TreviñoSymone M. BrownTiffany LuiShreya M. SarafMia V. RumpsMary K. Mulcahey
  • Intraoperative Dynamic Planning with Robotics Improves Patellar Tilt following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Travis R WeinerCatelyn A WoelfleMouhanad M El-OthmaniAlexander L NeuwirthJeffrey A GellerH John Cooper
  • Percutaneous Ultrasonic Tenotomy for Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Review
    Suganthi KandasamyAngel ValenciaAlexander TurnerJijia WangGeorge T. LiuMichael D. Vanpelt
  • Innovation in Orthopedic (Shoulder Surgery): Culture, Context, Creativity – Our Personal Perspective
    John "JP" Warner, MDSusanna GallaniDevin Vasquez
  • At The Conference...Spine Surgery ASCs: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
    Neil Badlani, MD
  • Voices in Orthopaedics™... The Residency Programs: Columbia Orthopedics- A Day in The Life of Orthopaedic Residents
    William Crockatt, MDD. Joanna Kim, MDNatalia Czerwonka, MDVibav Mouli, MDPrashanth Kumar, MDNana Sarpong, MD
  • At The Conference...A Case-Based Overview of the Evaluation and Management of Juvenile and Adult Osteochondritis Dissecans (OCD) Lesions of the Knee
    Brian ColeKrish SardesaiKyle KunzeJason Jesse
  • The Path to Full Robotic Integration in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Binational Perspective
    Umberto VitaleFederico D'AmarioFabio Orozco
  • Quadriceps Tendon Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft for ACL Reconstruction in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Paula Salazar Mendoza, MSEmre Adalier, BSThierry Grimm, MSJakub Kaszyński, PT, PhDFrank Lartey, MDDiego J. L. Lima, MD
  • Bridged-Enhanced ACL Restoration: An Adolescent Case Report with 18-Month Follow-up
    Zachary W SigmanFrederick J PimentalAndrew K ChowMarco T Di StefanoScott A Sigman
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in US Veterans
    Mckenzie D. BrandtMelanie K. PetersonRamsey C. Kinney
  • At The Conference™... The Case for Distal Femoral Replacements over ORIF
    Christopher Johnson
  • In My Experience™...Minimally Invasive Resurfacing UKA: The Ultimate Kinematic Knee
    Martin H. Redish, MD
  • In My Experience™...My 20-Year Kinematic Alignment Journey: How It Led to a KA-Optimized Implant and a Forgotten Joint Score Similar to Anterior Hip Arthroplasty
    Stephen Howell, MDMaury L. Hull, PhD
  • Artificial Intelligence Provides Helpful Information to Patients Undergoing ACLR, But Patients May Not Fully Understand The Answers
    Grace BasralianKevin M. PosnerGrace ChesterMallery ZeimanYair D. KissinStephen G. SilverAmit Y. Merchant
  • Retrospective study identifying risk factors for severe glass injuries in paediatric population.
    Jerome Yung Kang ChanYun Xiu LamSpencer Jia Jie LohNicole Kim Luan LeeRonald Ming Ren TanShu-Ling ChongAshik Bin Zainuddin MohammadArjandras MahadevKenneth Pak Leung Wong
  • High Satisfaction Post Local Osteo-enhancement Procedure (LOEP): An Open Label Study in Patients with High Fracture Risk
    Jonathan ShaulKoen BulterysJo De Schepper
  • About The Innovation™…The Abanza WasherCap for ACL Fixation
    Larry Padgett, MDBlake Padgett, BS
  • MRI and Patient Reported Outcomes of a Hyaluronic Acid Based Rotator Cuff Augmentation Implant: A Pilot Case Series
    Andrew MooreRaahil PatelHumberto CardonaViktoria SochorEric CohenChristopher Baker
  • At The Conference™...No Extensor Tendon, Now What?
    Richard Buch, MD
  • Tart Cherry Supplementation in Postoperative Orthopedic Recovery: A Narrative Review of a Novel Anti-Inflammatory Adjunct
    Ambrose Loc NgoRachana TadakamallaCynthia ShahbendehJared Nichols
  • At The Conference...Deceptive Appearances: Case Studies of Tumors Mimicking
    Scott Porter, MD
  • At The Conference...Disasterplasty 2025: Are Cones Really Necessary in Revision; Cost is Prohibitive?
    Chris Johnson, DO
  • Evaluating Factors Influencing Patient Reviews: Variations in Professional Credentials and Demographics of Orthopedic Oncologists
    Roban ShabbirAnnika SurapaneniOrrin WilsonRobert HoySaqib Rehman
  • Retrospective Outcomes of Augmented Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair with a Reinforced Bioinductive Implant: A Short-Term Follow-up Analysis
    Sean McMillanElizabeth Ford
  • An Assessment of the Top 100 Most-Liked Orthopaedic Surgery TikTok Videos
    Connor J. TupperEmily A. ReesonMichael R. BurdynyLaura M. CoguaEugenia A. LinKate W. Nellans
  • Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes Using Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review
    Kha Minh Kami P. NguyenVincent LeeEmily N. JonesRamtin DoroodchiJohn S. AvantBrent A. Ponce
  • Evaluating Suture Passer Performance in Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears with Deep Layer Tendon Retraction
    Evan MoonAlexandra MakenzieMichael Greiwe
  • Trapdoor technique with adjuvant dehydrated alcohol and cryoablation for monostotic fibrous dysplasia
    Hong Jing LeeMohammad Ashik Bin ZainuddinArjandas MahadevKenneth Pak Leung Wong
  • Health Technology Assessments as an Alternative to Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Enrique RomeroMathew MendozaGregory Brown
  • Substantial Variability Exists in the Reporting of Clinically Significant Outcomes Following Meniscal Procedures: A Systematic Review
    Benjamin T. LackJustin T. ChildersColton C. MowersGarrett R. JacksonDerrick M. KnapikSteven F. DeFroda
  • Emerging Surface Coating Innovations for Orthopedic Implants: A Review
    Yousif AboazizaErick AghaianRonald Hillock
  • Cost Analysis of Orthopaedic Tumor Treatment: A Comprehensive Review
    William NguyenDiego Alvarez-VegaAlexander NguyenGennaro DellicarpiniShyam Patel
  • Efficacy of Intra-Operative Hematoma Blocks Before Spica Casting of Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Pilot Study
    Carson TwissJeremy BrownRobert UmberhandtShaban Demirel
  • From My Perspective™...The Incision Point...The Robot in the Room: More proof that robotic assisted surgery is still not superior
    Michael Meneghini, MD
  • Is an Opioid Prescription Necessary after Joint Replacement in 2026?
    Anjali MalhotraKayleigh CorradoBrian FullerAndrew Wickline
  • High-Volume Total Joint Arthroplasty in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systems-Based Framework for International Surgical Collaboration
    Ahmed SiddiqiMuhammad ChinoyJunaid MakdaBrian FullerKhalid YousufUmar Burney
  • Image-guided injections versus anatomical-based injections for carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis: A Systematic Review
    Troy PugaCharles MarcheseVincent DieuMcKenna BoxJohn BadylakJohn Riehl
  • Emerging Peptide Therapies in Orthopaedics: Evidence, Safety, and Perioperative Implications
    Ahmed SiddiqiKhalid YousufPaul B. Jacob
  • Integrating Patient-Reported Functional Outcome Measures in Determining Eligibility for Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Derrick KangLachlan KirbyAlex Hernandez ManriquezManjot SinghJoyce HararyPeter L SchillingWayne E Moschetti
  • Does Liposomal Bupivacaine Provide Additional Postoperative Pain Control for Distal Radius Fracture Volar Plating Performed with a Supraclavicular Nerve Block?
    Yen Hsun ChenCharles EksteinChloe HeitingDavid TuckmanAndrew GreenbergKate Nellans
  • Complications following Hook Plate Fixation of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: A Systematic Review
    Udit DaveAyobami T. AdeagboGabrielle E. Owusu-AnsahShreya M. SarafMia V. RumpsMary Mulcahey
  • Idiopathic Medial Patellar Instability Treated with Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus Allograft
    Jason KreincesThomas BedardZachary Vredenburgh
  • Custom PEKK Triflange Implant for Reconstruction of a Post-infectious Acetabular Defect: A Case Report
    Jon Minter, MDGeorgiana Hopper, MD
  • Computer Navigation in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: National Utilization and Comparative Mid-Term Outcomes
    Zachary FullerManjot SinghShriyaus LingamJorden UriasAlan H DanielsZuhdi E Abdo
  • Open Latarjet Versus Arthroscopic Free Bone Block for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Comparative Review
    Paul SethiShariff K BishaiFrank AlbertaParth KamdarJohn SharpeTim SaundersEllie Sheehan
  • Novel Plate Fixation of Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study
    Tessa DeCiccoBenson ChanTimothy Damron
  • No-Code AI for Surgeons: Bridging Clinical Insight and Digital Tool Development—A Conceptual Perspective
    Aibin B MichaelSuyog WaghBurhannuddin Fakhruddin Chhatriwala
  • Citation Inaccuracies in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Novel Classification and Precautions for AI-Generated Bibliographies
    Erik R NakkenVictoria AquilinoJacqueline K KobayashiEmily K PorterWilliam R Aibinder
  • Incidence and Barriers to Bone Health Specialist Appointments Following Geriatric Hip Fracture
    Brooklyn CampbellJoshua OlatundeJeffton PierreDavid FreezeKylee Rucinski
  • Evaluating the Baseline Risk Factors and Post-operative Outcomes of Patients Internally Referred to a Subspecialist Surgeon for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Study
    Jack R. FelknerIshani A. DeliwalaWilliam R. DavisMichael A. LyHeidi IsraelJames F. FraserLisa K. Cannada
  • Can you Pay your way to Readership? In Total Hip Arthroplasty Literature, Free Open Access Publications Outperform Paid Publications
    Jean P. BontempsTimothy R. BuchananRobert J. CuetoAndrew B. HarrisJulius K. Oni
  • From Incision to Recovery: Advances and Challenges in Wound Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Mohamed ElfekkyMohadese RajaeiradEmam Mohamed AhmedMohamed Ahmed Hassan Abdou ElsayedEslam Mohammed ShalabyMohamad Aikrch Al HarounSari AidekFarivar BagheriHamidreza EsmaeiliSamih Tarabichi
  • Health Literacy and Outcomes of Shoulder Arthroplasty Using the Campbell Assessment of Shoulder Education (CASE) Score
    Andrew D. NahrTanner R. PoppeCarlos A. Rivera-PerazaDerek T. DixonTyler J. BrolinThomas W. ThrockmortonDavid Bernholt
  • One Dedicated Operating Room Team Member Improves Total Joint Arthroplasty Efficiency
    Caleb A. FordBryant M. SongAndrew M. SchneiderRyan M. NunleyGrace GarrettIlya Bendich
  • The Accuracy of Mechanical Axis Measurements with an Image-based Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty System
    Keith M. Baumgarten
  • A Look at the Outliers: Optimal Placement for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Evan MoonAlexandra MakenzieMir AshrafMichael Greiwe
  • Radiographic Measurements in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Accuracy of Preoperative Planning
    Aman ChopraLinda ZhangGrace KnoerJiling ChouMelissa WrightAnand Murthi
  • The Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Iliotibial Band Syndrome: a bibliometric analysis
    Abdullah B ChandasirNoora S ChandasirYagni PatelAkshar PatelUmar GhilzaiPhillip N Williams
  • Surgical and Conservative Management of Adductor Tendinopathy Yield Comparable Outcomes and Complications: A Systematic Review
    Colton C. MowersLaura del Baño-BarragánEric J. CotterFelicitas AllendeMatthew T. McKinleyJorge Chahla
  • Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model: Who Will Bust the Bundle?
    Penelope N. HalkiadakisSimran SahnanAlison K. KlikaChao ZhangJordan McInerneyWael Barsoum
  • In My Experience™...Why A Frozen Shoulder Doesn’t Get Better and What Actually Works to Fix it
    Don Buford,, MD
  • Association Between Posterior Cruciate Ligament Resection and Medial Gap Laxity in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
    William K. CrockattKyle S. NulandMichael B. HeldRoshan P. ShahH. John Cooper
  • Gender Inequality in Reporting Injuries of U.S.A. Collegiate and Professional Athletes: a Narrative Review
    Ravali ReddyChristina FreibergerMia RumpsBryan VopatMary K. Mulcahey
  • Assessing the Utility of Pedometer Data in Predicting Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Clinical Progress
    Sepehr KhavariNicholas D'AmbroseDillan PrasadJames G. LymanMichael C. OblichMatthew B. AllenNikhil PrasadAnastasios G. RoumeliotisAlok D. Sharan
J Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Kang, Derrick, Lachlan Kirby, Alex Hernandez Manriquez, Manjot Singh, Joyce Harary, Peter L Schilling, and Wayne E Moschetti. 2026. “Integrating Patient-Reported Functional Outcome Measures in Determining Eligibility for Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty.” Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.154242.
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Abstract

Background

Since the removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Medicare Inpatient‑Only (IPO) list in 2020, there has been a growing trend towards outpatient procedures. Recent studies have demonstrated equivalent complications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among inpatient and outpatient THA patients, but existing selection tools primarily emphasize medical comorbidities. This study assessed the value of incorporating preoperative PROMs into clinical-decision making tools to adequately identify patients most suitable for outpatient THA.

Methods

Adult patients who underwent unilateral THA between 2018-2024 and used a web-based home therapy program were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were stratified by length of stay into outpatient (same-day discharge, LOS <24 hours from surgery to discharge) and inpatient (LOS ≥24 hours). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and preoperative PROMs were compared. Backward logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify preoperative parameters predictive of outpatient THA.

Results

Among 1,090 patients (mean age 68.6 years, 51% female), Outpatient THA patients had lower mean age (64.8 vs 69.3 years), Medicare insurance rates (31% vs 44%), preoperative assistive device use (21% vs 30%), and frailty (0.1 vs 0.2) (all p<0.05). In addition, they had higher PROMIS Overall (34.1 vs 31.6), Physical (41.6 vs 39.1), and Mental (50.9 vs 48.2), and HOOS JR (52.5 vs 49.1) scores (all p<0.01). Regression analyses identified age <75 years (OR=3.6, p<0.001), PROMIS Overall >40 (OR=2.0, p=0.002), and HOOS JR >40 (OR=1.6, p=0.042) to be predictive of outpatient THA candidacy. ROC curve analyses incorporating these parameters showed good model discrimination (area under the curve=0.7, p<0.001).

Conclusion

Patient age, PROMIS Overall and HOOS JR scores were independent predictors of outpatient THA. Functional outcomes should be integrated in traditional comorbidity-based tools when selecting patients for outpatient THA.

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful orthopedic surgeries and its utilization is increasing in parallel with the aging population (American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons 2019). In the United States, annual volume is projected to reach approximately 850,000 procedures by 2030 (Cochrane, Klika, Mont, et al. 2023). Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift toward fast-track recovery protocols and outpatient-based THA, with studies estimating that over half of all primary hip and knee replacements will be performed outpatient by 2026 (DeCook 2019). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) further reinforced this trend by removing THA from the inpatient-only (IPO) list in 2020, allowing Medicare reimbursement of THA for hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgical centers (Horn, Reischl, Morton, et al. 2022). This policy change has accelerated the adoption of outpatient THA, and expanded eligibility beyond the historically healthiest patient populations (Jaibaji, Sawalha, Malahias, et al. 2020; Kort, van der Sijp, Clement, et al. 2017).

Existing literature has consistently shown that outpatient THA can be safely performed in appropriately selected patients without an increased risk of 90-day complications or readmissions (American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons 2019; LeBrun, Goodman, Friedman, et al. 2023; Lyman, Lee, Franklin, et al. 2016). In addition, outpatient protocols have been associated with reduced costs for health systems without compromising pain control or functional recovery (Lyman, Lee, Franklin, et al. 2016). However, most current outpatient arthroplasty selection tools utilize patient demographics and medical comorbidities, with little emphasis on functional status. The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) Score, as an example, incorporates comorbidity burden, lab values, and social factors to predict the need for a longer hospital stay (LeBrun, Goodman, Friedman, et al. 2023). While such an approach can provide valuable risk stratification, it largely neglects baseline physical function which can subsequently impact postoperative recovery from THA.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Junior (HOOS-JR) and the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), are increasingly recognized as valuable tools providing direct insight into patients’ self-perceived health and function. They have additionally been validated in hip arthroplasty populations and offer prognostic utility in predicting which patients will achieve meaningful improvement after arthroplasty (Migliorini, Eschweiler, Helmers, et al. 2021; Rosinsky, Kay, Cooper, et al. 2020; Stiegel, Sershon, Penrose, et al. 2019). However, while they are being more routinely collected, these PROMs are not systematically incorporated in perioperative planning to inform patient candidacy for accelerated recovery pathways (Xu, Li, Xu, et al. 2019).

Given this gap, the present study evaluated whether routinely collected preoperative PROMs can be used to identify candidates for outpatient THA. Integrating PROMs into preoperative decision-making could provide a more patient-centered and function-oriented assessment, complementing traditional comorbidity-based models.

METHODS

Study Design

This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Force Therapeutics platform (Force Therapeutics, New York, NY, USA), a web-based patient education and engagement system that collects PROMs before and after THA. Institutional review board approval was waived since no protected health information was collected and informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the database.

Data Extraction

Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and PROMs were extracted for analysis. Demographic variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and Medicare insurance status. Comorbidities included diagnoses of heart disease, depression, diabetes, respiratory conditions, and tobacco use, as well as modified frailty index 5-item score. Clinical characteristics comprised hospital length of stay (LOS), preoperative history of falls, use of assistive devices, use of pain medications, and 90-day postoperative emergency department (ED) visits. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR).

Patient Population

Adult patients aged 18 years and older were included in this study if they used the Force Therapeutics platform and underwent unilateral THA between 2018 and 2024. In total, 1,090 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 68.6 years, 50.8% were of female sex, and the mean BMI was 30.2 kg/m². Approximately 41.9% of patients had Medicare insurance. The most common comorbidities were depression (11.8%), heart disease (8.3%), and diabetes (7.7%), with an overall low burden of comorbidity as reflected by a mean modified frailty index 5-item of 0.2. At the surgical visit, 29.3% had a history of falls, 28.6% used assistive device use (28.6%), and 11.6% were on pain medications (Table 1).

Table 1.Preoperative Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Inpatient and Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients
Variable Total
(N = 1090)
Inpatient THA
(N = 908)
Outpatient THA
(N = 182)
P-⁠value
Age (years) 68.56 (11.36) 69.31 (11.54) 64.79 (9.65) <0.001
Female Sex 554 (50.8) 465 (51.2) 89 (48.9) 0.569
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 30.20 (6.42) 30.36 (6.55) 29.39 (5.73) 0.094
Medicare Insurance 457 (41.9) 401 (44.2) 56 (30.8) <0.001
Clinical Characteristics
Pain Medication Use 126 (11.6) 111 (12.2) 15 (8.2) 0.125
History of Falls 319 (29.3) 271 (29.8) 48 (26.4) 0.347
Assistive Device Use 312 (28.6) 273 (30.1) 39 (21.4) 0.019
ED Visits 70 (6.4) 62 (6.9) 8 (4.4) 0.210
Comorbidities
Heart Disease 91 (8.3) 76 (8.4) 15 (8.2) 0.954
Depression 129 (11.8) 109 (12.0) 20 (11.0) 0.699
Diabetes 84 (7.7) 74 (8.1) 10 (5.5) 0.220
Respiratory Condition 75 (6.9) 67 (7.4) 8 (4.4) 0.147
Tobacco Use 67 (6.1) 58 (6.4) 9 (4.9) 0.460
Modified Frailty Index 5-item 0.16 (0.20) 0.16 (0.20) 0.13 (0.17) 0.041

Abbreviations: THA = Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Statistical Analyses

Demographic, clinical, and preoperative PROMs data were summarized using means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Patients were stratified by length of stay into outpatient (same-day discharge, LOS <24 hours from surgery to discharge) and inpatient (LOS ≥24 hours) cohorts. Discharges occurring after midnight, as well as admissions remaining overnight or for observation purposes, were classified as inpatient if they exceeded the 24-hour period. Comparisons between groups were conducted using Student’s t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square (χ²) tests for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise elimination was performed to identify preoperative factors independently associated with outpatient THA status. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX), with a two-sided p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

A total of 1,090 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 908 inpatient and 182 outpatient THA cases. Outpatient THA patients were younger (64.8 vs 69.3, p<0.001), had lower rates of Medicare insurance (30.8% vs 44.2%, p<0.001), infrequently used assistive devices (21.4% vs 30.1%, p=0.019), and had lower mean modified frailty index scores (0.1 vs 0.2, p=0.041). No significant differences were observed between groups with respect to sex, BMI, comorbidities, pain medication use, history of falls, or postoperative ED visits (p>0.05 for all) (Table 1).

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Outpatient THA patients had significantly higher preoperative PROMIS Overall (34.1 vs 31.6, p<0.001), PROMIS Physical (41.6 vs 39.1, p<0.001), and PROMIS Mental (50.9 vs 48.2, p<0.001) scores. In addition, they also had higher HOOS JR scores (52.5 vs 49.1, p = 0.004) than inpatient THA patients as well (Table 2).

Table 2.Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Inpatient and Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients
Variable Total
(N = 1090)
Inpatient THA
(N = 908)
Outpatient THA
(N = 182)
P-⁠value
PROMIS Overall 32.05 (7.23) 31.61 (7.16) 34.10 (7.19) <0.001
PROMIS Physical 39.52 (7.00) 39.08 (6.89) 41.61 (7.19) <0.001
PROMIS Mental 48.64 (9.37) 48.16 (9.24) 50.92 (9.65) <0.001
HOOS JR 49.67 (13.88) 49.07 (13.74) 52.52 (14.20) 0.004

Abbreviations: THA = Total Hip Arthroplasty, PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, HOOS JR = Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement.

Predictors of Outpatient THA

Multivariable logistic regression identified age <75 years (OR=3.57, 95% CI=2.27–5.56, p<0.001), PROMIS Overall score ≥40 (OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.28–2.94, p=0.002), and HOOS JR score ≥40 (OR=1.56, 95% CI=1.02–2.44, p=0.042) as independent predictors of undergoing outpatient THA (Table 3). ROC curve analyses incorporating these parameters showed good model discrimination (area under the curve=0.7, p<0.001). No difference in Emergency Room Visits was noted between the outpatient and inpatient groups (Table 1).

Table 3.Preoperative Predictors of Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty
Variable Coeff SE OR 95% CI P-⁠value
Age >75 years 1.27 0.23 3.57 2.27 – 5.56 <0.001
PROMIS Overall <40 Points 0.67 0.22 1.96 1.28 – 2.94 0.002
HOOS JR <40 Points 0.45 0.22 1.56 1.02 – 2.44 0.042

Abbreviations: Coeff = Unstandardized Beta Coefficient, SE = Standard Error, OR = Odds Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval, PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, HOOS JR = Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement.

DISCUSSION

Our study identified several key preoperative factors predictive of successful same-day discharge following THA. Patients younger than 75 years were significantly more likely to undergo outpatient THA, whereas older patients more frequently required inpatient recovery. In addition, higher preoperative patient-reported outcomes, specifically PROMIS Overall and HOOS JR, were independently associated with increased odds of discharge to home on the day of surgery. These findings suggest baseline functional and health status, as determined by PROMs scores, should be considered when selecting patients for outpatient THA.

In our cohort, roughly 17% of THA cases were managed with same-day discharge. All of the surgeries were performed at a single academic medical center where the option for inpatient admission was always available. Outpatient THA patients were generally younger, had lower frailty scores, lower rates of Medicare insurance, and used assistive devices less frequently. These characteristics suggest that patient-level factors influenced assignment to outpatient pathways, reflecting real-world clinical judgment in selecting appropriate candidates. While the overall proportion may initially appear low, it likely reflects the gradual institutional adoption of outpatient protocols over the study time period and the removal of THA from Medicare’s inpatient only list. Importantly, this rate is consistent with national trends, as by 2022 only around 16% of THAs were performed as same-day outpatient procedures (Fedorka, Srikumaran, Abboud, et al. 2024). These contextual factors suggest that our findings remain representative of broader practice patterns during this transitional era. They further support the notion that PROMs could play a valuable role in increasing this percentage by helping predict outpatient discharge.

Age emerged as a strong determinant of discharge disposition, with patients younger than 75 years being 3.6 times more likely to be discharged home on the day of surgery. Courtney et al. have previously reported that patients older than 70 years faced significantly higher risks of postoperative complications and 30-day readmission following hip arthroplasty, underscoring the association between advanced age and the need for inpatient care (Courtney, Molinari, Paprosky, et al. 2017). Similarly, Basques et al., have found that patients aged 85 years and older had increased odds of readmission after same-day joint replacement procedures (Basques, Tetreault, Della Valle, et al. 2017). In a multicenter study of outpatient THA, Lieberman et al. identified further older age as an independent predictor of failure to achieve same-day discharge (Lieberman, Hannon, Pelt, et al. 2021). These results are consistent with our findings, and studies adopting similar age thresholds have reported comparable outcomes in facilitating outpatient recovery (Goyal, Chen, Padgett, et al. 2017). As a result, most outpatient THA series are composed predominantly of younger, healthier patients (Scully, Kappa, and Melvin 2020). From a clinical perspective, advancing age is frequently accompanied by a higher comorbidity burden, reduced physiologic reserve, and limited early mobility, all of which hinder participation in accelerated recovery protocols. Our results reaffirm that chronological age, particularly beyond the mid-70s, remains one of the strongest predictors of discharge setting, and age should be a key consideration in outpatient THA selection criteria.

PROMs were also independent predictors of outpatient candidacy in our cohort. Higher HOOS JR and PROMIS Overall scores were independently associated with increased odds of same-day discharge. Specifically, PROMIS Overall score greater than 40 and HOOS JR score greater than 40 were linked to nearly twice the odds of outpatient THA. Padilla et al. previously demonstrated strong correlations between HOOS-JR and PROMIS Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) scores, suggesting that improved joint-specific function reflects better overall health status (Padilla, Lazzaro, Maloney, et al. 2019). Similarly, Iwata et al. identified lower preoperative hip scores as independent predictors of non-home discharge following THA (Iwata, Momose, Matsuda, et al. 2023). Sutton et al. also reported that patients with stronger baseline PROMs were more likely to be discharged home, whereas those with lower scores were more frequently transitioned to extended care settings (Sutton, Austin, Keeney, et al. 2023). These findings support the concept that functional readiness, as perceived and reported by patients themselves, is an important determinant of safe outpatient management that may be neglected by existing outpatient arthroplasty selection tools, such as the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) and the OARA score which primarily emphasize medical comorbidities. Importantly, low PROMs should not be interpreted as reasons to defer or deny surgery, but rather as indicators of the need for potential additional perioperative planning and support (Fu, Daines, Yang, et al. 2017). Incorporating PROMs into preoperative assessments may therefore enhance risk stratification, as studies have demonstrated that the inclusion of function status measures improves prediction of postoperative complication and resource utilization (Schmocker, Havlik, Bruce, et al. 2023).

The present study has several limitations. First, the data were derived from a single tertiary center with an outpatient pathway which may limit the generalizability to other institutions without similar infrastructure or outpatient pathways. Second, due to limitations in the dataset, we were unable to account for patients’ social support systems, extent of radiographic degeneration, perioperative anesthesia techniques (such as type of anesthesia, use of local infiltration analgesia), surgical approach, and postoperative outpatient physical therapy availability, which could have influenced discharge timing and disposition. Third, as an observational study, there is a potential for selection bias, wherein surgeons may have preferentially selected healthier patients for same-day discharge. Although statistical adjustments were performed, the possibility of residual confounding remains. Fourth, secular trends over the 2018-2024 study period, such as the removal of THA from the CMS inpatient-only list in 2020 and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital practice, could have influenced outpatient adoption rates but were not accounted for in the current analyses. This is because the number of outpatient cases in the early years of the study was limited, which could have led to unstable estimates if year of surgery were included as a covariate. Such temporal patterns could result in a correlation between PROMs and discharge disposition that reflects changing practice patterns rather than inherent predictive strength. Despite these limitations, the findings offer clinically meaningful insights for outpatient arthroplasty planning.

CONCLUSION

An age threshold of less than 75 years, combined with preoperative PROMIS Overall and HOOS JR scores above 40, was associated with significantly higher odds of successful same-day discharge following total hip arthroplasty. These findings indicate that baseline functional status, as measured by PROMs, provides practical and patient-centered criteria for outpatient candidacy. Unlike traditional comorbidity-driven risk scores, this study highlights the underrecognized role of functional health in guiding perioperative decision-making Integrating PROMs into preoperative evaluation may improve risk stratification and help guide safe, evidence-based expansion of outpatient THA.

Submitted: October 25, 2025 EDT

Accepted: December 11, 2025 EDT

References

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. 2019. “CMS Inpatient-Only List Update.” August 8, 2019. https:/​/​www.aahks.org/​advocacy/​cy2020-opps-asc-pr/​.
Basques, B. A., M. W. Tetreault, C. J. Della Valle, et al. 2017. “Same-Day Discharge Compared with Inpatient Hospitalization Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.” J Bone Joint Surg Am 99 (23): 1969–77. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.2106/​JBJS.16.00739.
Google Scholar
Cochrane, N. H., A. K. Klika, M. A. Mont, et al. 2023. “Removal of Total Hip Arthroplasty from the Inpatient-Only List Has Improved Patient Selection and Expanded Optimization Efforts.” J Arthroplasty 38 (7 Suppl 1): S23–28. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2023.03.007.
Google Scholar
Courtney, P. M., K. S. Molinari, W. G. Paprosky, et al. 2017. “Complications Following Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a National Database.” J Arthroplasty 32 (5): 1426–30. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2016.11.055.
Google Scholar
DeCook, C. A. 2019. “Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty: Transitioning to the Ambulatory Surgery Center.” J Arthroplasty 34 (7 Suppl 2): S48–50. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2019.01.006.
Google Scholar
Fedorka, C. J., U. Srikumaran, J. A. Abboud, et al. 2024. “Trends in the Adoption of Outpatient Joint Arthroplasties and Patient Risk: A Retrospective Analysis of 2019 to 2021 Medicare Claims Data.” J Am Acad Orthop Surg 32 (15): e741–49. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.5435/​JAAOS-D-23-00572.
Google Scholar
Fu, M. C., S. B. Daines, D. S. Yang, et al. 2017. “Discharge to Inpatient Facilities after Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with Increased Postdischarge Morbidity.” J Arthroplasty 32 (9 Suppl): S144-S149.e1. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2017.03.044.
Google Scholar
Goyal, N., A.F. Chen, S.E. Padgett, et al. 2017. “Otto Aufranc Award: A Multicenter, Randomized Study of Outpatient versus Inpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty.” Clin Orthop Relat Res 475 (2): 364–72. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11999-016-4915-z.
Google Scholar
Horn, M. E., S. F. Reischl, A. A. Morton, et al. 2022. “Can Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Measures Differentiate Patients Who Will Undergo Hip and Knee Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.” J Arthroplasty 37 (6 Suppl 1): S56–62. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2022.02.053.
Google Scholar
Iwata, H., K. Momose, S. Matsuda, et al. 2023. “Predictive Factors for Discharge Destination after Total Hip Arthroplasty.” J Orthop Sci 28 (4): 802–5. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jos.2022.05.005.
Google Scholar
Jaibaji, M., S. Sawalha, M. A. Malahias, et al. 2020. “Is Outpatient Arthroplasty Safe? A Systematic Review.” J Arthroplasty 35 (7): 1941–49. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2020.02.022.
Google Scholar
Kort, N. P., J. R. van der Sijp, N. D. Clement, et al. 2017. “Patient Selection Criteria for Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty.” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25 (9): 2668–75. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00167-016-4140-z.
Google Scholar
LeBrun, D. G., A. D. Goodman, M. T. Friedman, et al. 2023. “The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) Score Predicts Discharge Destination, Length of Stay, and Postoperative Mobility after Total Joint Arthroplasty.” J Arthroplasty 38 (7 Suppl 2): S121–29. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2023.05.010.
Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. G., C. P. Hannon, C. E. Pelt, et al. 2021. “Allergies, Preoperative Narcotic Use, and Increased Age Predict Failed Same-Day Discharge after Joint Replacement.” J Arthroplasty 36 (7S): S168–72. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2021.01.015.
Google Scholar
Lyman, S., Y.-Y. Lee, P.D. Franklin, et al. 2016. “Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-Form Hip Replacement Survey.” Clin Orthop Relat Res 474 (6): 1472–82. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11999-016-4718-2.
Google Scholar
Migliorini, F., J. Eschweiler, R. Helmers, et al. 2021. “Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.” Appl Sci 11:6853. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3390/​app11156853.
Google Scholar
Padilla, J. A., J. J. Lazzaro, W. J. Maloney, et al. 2019. “Relationship between the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and Traditional Patient-Reported Outcomes for Osteoarthritis.” J Arthroplasty 34 (2): 265–72. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2018.10.012.
Google Scholar
Rosinsky, P. J., C. L. Kay, H. J. Cooper, et al. 2020. “Outpatient vs Inpatient Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study on a 90-Day Complication Rate and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes.” J Orthop Surg Res 15:415. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1186/​s13018-020-01871-8.
Google Scholar
Schmocker, R. K., H. S. Havlik, C. J. Bruce, et al. 2023. “A Novel Preoperative Patient Survey Predicts Adverse Patient Outcomes—Implementation and Preliminary Results of the Tennessee Preoperative Assessment Tool.” Am Surg 89 (7): 3192–99. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1177/​00031348231157848.
Google Scholar
Scully, R. D., J. E. Kappa, and J. S. Melvin. 2020. “‘Outpatient’—Same-Calendar-Day Discharge Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.” J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28 (24): e900–909. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.5435/​JAAOS-D-19-00608.
Google Scholar
Stiegel, K. R., R. A. Sershon, C. T. Penrose, et al. 2019. “Early Experience and Results Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.” J Arthroplasty 34 (10): 2313–18. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2019.05.044.
Google Scholar
Sutton, R. M., D. C. Austin, J. A. Keeney, et al. 2023. “The Appropriateness of Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as an Indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty.” J Arthroplasty 38 (7 Suppl 2): S252–57. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.arth.2022.09.004.
Google Scholar
Xu, J., C. Li, L. Xu, et al. 2019. “Comparison of Outpatient versus Inpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications.” J Orthop 18:196–200. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jor.2019.08.022.
Google Scholar

Attachments

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system